Blood Report Redesign

Blood Report Redesign

Turning a post-pivot mess into a scalable reporting system

Products
Products
Products

Overview

Overview

Company type

Company type

The NU, Longevity B2B2C startup

The NU, Longevity B2B2C startup

Role

Role

Product Designer. Worked alongside an Art Director initially, then led design independently. Led external agency. Collaborated with PM, Science, and Tech team.

Product Designer. Worked alongside an Art Director initially, then led design independently. Led external agency. Collaborated with PM, Science, and Tech team.

Platform

Platform

Web SaaS (desktop-first), part of a larger longevity OS

Web SaaS (desktop-first), part of a larger longevity OS

The situation

The situation

I joined this project right after a B2C to B2B2C pivot. The blood report - a critical feature for practitioners - was still a static PDF embedded in the web app: 70+ biomarkers in an endless scroll, with no interactivity, trends, or filtering. A quick fix that delivered a poor user experience for practitioners at the time. 

I joined this project right after a B2C to B2B2C pivot. The blood report - a critical feature for practitioners - was still a static PDF embedded in the web app: 70+ biomarkers in an endless scroll, with no interactivity, trends, or filtering. A quick fix that delivered a poor user experience for practitioners at the time. 

Before

Before

My approach

My approach

"Rather than applying quick fixes, I reframed the problem from "How do we make this report better?" to

"Rather than applying quick fixes, I reframed the problem from "How do we make this report better?" to

"How might we help practitioners tell the story of a patient's health?"

"How might we help practitioners tell the story of a patient's health?"

"How might we help practitioners tell the story of a patient's health?"

This shifted our focus from data display to the narrative. Practitioners don't just read numbers - they guide patients through what's wrong, what's improving, and what to do next.

I mapped trends requirements across all platform reports (Blood, Genome, Microbiome, Age Clocks) before designing anything. This ensured whatever we built would scale, not just solve one report."

This shifted our focus from data display to the narrative. Practitioners don't just read numbers - they guide patients through what's wrong, what's improving, and what to do next.

I mapped trends requirements across all platform reports (Blood, Genome, Microbiome, Age Clocks) before designing anything. This ensured whatever we built would scale, not just solve one report."

Key design decisions

Key design decisions

01

Dual navigation

Supporting different mental models

02

Progressive disclosure

Overview first, depth on demand

03

Unified trend component

Designing for edge cases

04

Modular detail panel

Building for scale

Research showed that practitioners work differently. Some scan by severity, others by body system. We needed to support both. I designed two views:

  • Groups view: Collapsible panels by clinical category for narrative-driven consultations

  • Classification view: Three columns by status (Out of range / Reference / Optimal) for quick problem identification

One report, two workflows. Practitioners choose.

01

Dual navigation

Supporting different mental models

02

Progressive disclosure

Overview first, depth on demand

03

Unified trend component

Designing for edge cases

04

Modular detail panel

Building for scale

Research showed that practitioners work differently. Some scan by severity, others by body system. We needed to support both. I designed two views:

  • Groups view: Collapsible panels by clinical category for narrative-driven consultations

  • Classification view: Three columns by status (Out of range / Reference / Optimal) for quick problem identification

One report, two workflows. Practitioners choose.

01

Dual navigation

Supporting different mental models

02

Progressive disclosure

Overview first, depth on demand

03

Unified trend component

Designing for edge cases

04

Modular detail panel

Building for scale

Research showed that practitioners work differently. Some scan by severity, others by body system. We needed to support both. I designed two views:

  • Groups view: Collapsible panels by clinical category for narrative-driven consultations

  • Classification view: Three columns by status (Out of range / Reference / Optimal) for quick problem identification

One report, two workflows. Practitioners choose.

What didn't work

What didn't work

Not every decision was right the first time.

Classification-first assumption: I assumed most practitioners would prefer scanning by severity. User calls revealed many prefer a panel-by-panel narrative. Hence, the dual navigation. Neither view was wrong, we needed both.

Trend component inconsistency: Described above. A reminder that edge cases expose design flaws faster than happy paths.

Not every decision was right the first time.

Classification-first assumption: I assumed most practitioners would prefer scanning by severity. User calls revealed many prefer a panel-by-panel narrative. Hence, the dual navigation. Neither view was wrong, we needed both.

Trend component inconsistency: Described above. A reminder that edge cases expose design flaws faster than happy paths.

Outcomes

Outcomes

For practitioners

For practitioners

Eliminated manual ratio calculations

Eliminated manual ratio calculations

Dual navigation supports different narrative consultations

Dual navigation supports different narrative consultations

Inline trends provide historical context without extra clicks

Inline trends provide historical context without extra clicks

For the product

For the product

Modular components reused across four report types

Modular components reused across four report types

Unified trend component reduced front-end complexity

Unified trend component reduced front-end complexity

Pattern library established for future reports

Pattern library established for future reports

For the team

For the team

Cross-functional alignment improved through early engineering involvement

Cross-functional alignment improved through early engineering involvement

External agency was effectively directed with clear design direction

External agency was effectively directed with clear design direction

Key learnings

Key learnings

Design debt compounds. Address it early.

Design debt compounds. Address it early.

Design debt compounds. Address it early.

Systems thinking pays off - build patterns that scale.

Systems thinking pays off - build patterns that scale.

Systems thinking pays off - build patterns that scale.

Understand and build for users’ mental models.

Understand and build for users’ mental models.

Understand and build for users’ mental models.

Collaborate with engineering early for better design.

Collaborate with engineering early for better design.

Collaborate with engineering early for better design.

Other projects

Lead product designer

Empowering healthcare with tailored longevity solutions

Building feedback loop system

Designed feedback system for continuous improvement

Other projects

Lead product designer

Empowering healthcare with tailored longevity solutions

Building feedback loop system

About Subscription

Currently based in Slovenia

Currently based in Slovenia

Currently based in Slovenia